Supreme Court Overturns NGT Order On Art Of Living
SC sets aside NGT order, orders ₹5 crore refund. No direct link to environmental damage found.

The Supreme Court has set aside a 2017 National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that held the Art of Living Foundation liable for environmental damage to the Yamuna floodplains. The damage was alleged to have occurred during the World Culture Festival in March 2016.
The court found no direct evidence establishing a link between the Art of Living event and the alleged damage to the Yamuna floodplain ecosystem. A bench of Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and N Kotiswar Singh held that an individual or entity can be held absolutely liable for environmental damage only when a direct connection is established between the alleged activity and the harm caused.
The three-day World Culture Festival was held on the Yamuna floodplains in Delhi from March 11 to 13, 2016. Before the event, the NGT had allowed it to proceed while directing the foundation to deposit ₹5 crore as interim environmental compensation. The amount was to be adjusted against any final compensation after an assessment of the environmental damage.
In December 2017, the NGT held the Art of Living responsible for the damage and directed that the deposited amount be used by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for restoration of the affected floodplain. The tribunal also ordered a further assessment of the restoration costs.
The Supreme Court observed that the DDA had itself failed to properly protect the ecologically sensitive Yamuna floodplains. The court also noted that the authority's conduct in permitting the event was improper. However, the bench clarified that the legality of the DDA's permission for the event was not under challenge in the appeal before it.
The Supreme Court directed the DDA to refund the entire ₹5 crore deposited by Vyakti Vikas Kendra India. At the same time, it ordered the authority to continue the rehabilitation and restoration work on the Yamuna floodplains as directed earlier by the NGT.
The ruling provides significant relief to the Art of Living Foundation after nearly a decade of litigation, while also underscoring the responsibility of authorities to protect the environmentally sensitive Yamuna floodplains. The decision highlights the importance of establishing a direct link between an activity and environmental damage in order to hold an individual or entity liable.
The World Culture Festival was a major event that drew attention to the issue of environmental protection in India. The Supreme Court's decision will have implications for future events and activities that take place in environmentally sensitive areas.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's ruling in this case emphasizes the need for careful consideration of the potential environmental impacts of large-scale events and activities. It also highlights the importance of holding authorities accountable for protecting environmentally sensitive areas.
The decision is a significant development in the ongoing efforts to protect the Yamuna floodplains and promote environmental sustainability in India. It will be interesting to see how the DDA and other authorities respond to the Supreme Court's directives and work to restore and protect the Yamuna floodplains in the future.
The Supreme Court's ruling is a reminder that environmental protection is a critical issue that requires careful attention and action from all stakeholders. It is essential to strike a balance between economic development and environmental protection to ensure a sustainable future for India.
The Art of Living Foundation and other organizations will likely welcome the Supreme Court's decision, which provides clarity and relief after nearly a decade of litigation. However, the decision also underscores the need for continued vigilance and action to protect the environment and promote sustainability.
The Supreme Court's decision will have far-reaching implications for environmental protection and sustainability in India. It will be important to monitor the implementation of the court's directives and the progress made in restoring and protecting the Yamuna floodplains in the coming years.
In the end, the Supreme Court's ruling is a significant step forward in the efforts to protect the environment and promote sustainability in India. It emphasizes the importance of careful consideration of the potential environmental impacts of large-scale events and activities and highlights the need for authorities to be held accountable for protecting environmentally sensitive areas.
Frequently asked questions
What was the Supreme Court's decision on the Art of Living Foundation's liability for environmental damage?
The Supreme Court set aside the NGT order holding the Art of Living Foundation liable for environmental damage to the Yamuna floodplains.
How much money did the Supreme Court order the DDA to refund to the Art of Living Foundation?
The Supreme Court ordered the DDA to refund ₹5 crore to the Art of Living Foundation.