Bombay HC Orders NTA to Produce NEET UG 2026 OMR Sheets

The Bombay High Court has directed the National Testing Agency (NTA) to produce the original OMR answer sheets of three NEET UG 2026 candidates.

The candidates, Hricha Deshpande, Soham Gavate, and Atharva Jagtap, alleged discrepancies between their expected scores and the marks awarded in the final results.

A division bench of Justice Nitin Suryawanshi and Justice Abasaheb Shinde at the Aurangabad Bench issued notices to the Centre and the NTA on petitions filed by the candidates.

The court ordered the NTA to produce the petitioners' answer sheets on the next date, which is July 30, 2026.

The petitioners claimed that their NEET UG 2026 scores, declared on July 16, were significantly lower than the marks they calculated using their OMR sheets and the official answer key.

Deshpande alleged that the OMR sheet displayed on the NTA portal reflected responses corresponding to an expected score of around 619 marks. However, she later received another OMR sheet via email that allegedly showed significantly fewer attempted answers in Physics and Chemistry, reducing her expected score to around 280.

She claimed that she immediately informed the NTA about the discrepancy before the results were declared.

The other two petitioners have also alleged similar discrepancies in their OMR records.

The NTA has been directed to produce the original answer sheets on July 30, when the matter will be next heard.

Earlier, the NTA issued a clarification on social media regarding OMR-related claims for NEET (UG) 2026, stating that the genuine OMR of every candidate concerned is on record with NTA.

The NTA also warned students against submitting fake AI-generated OMR sheets, threatening legal action.

The Bombay High Court's order is a significant development in the case, as it may help resolve the discrepancies alleged by the candidates.

The NEET UG 2026 results have been a subject of controversy, with several candidates alleging discrepancies in their scores.

The court's decision to seek the original OMR sheets may provide clarity on the issue and help the candidates get a fair assessment of their scores.

The matter will be closely watched, as it may have implications for the counselling process and the future of the candidates involved.

The Bombay High Court's intervention in the matter highlights the importance of transparency and fairness in the examination process.

It is essential for the NTA to ensure that the examination process is free from errors and discrepancies, and that the candidates are given a fair chance to assess their scores.

The court's order is a step in the right direction, and it will be interesting to see how the matter unfolds in the coming days.

In conclusion, the Bombay High Court's order to produce the original OMR sheets is a significant development in the NEET UG 2026 controversy.

It may help resolve the discrepancies alleged by the candidates and provide clarity on the issue.

The matter will be closely watched, and it will be interesting to see how it affects the counselling process and the future of the candidates involved.

The decision of the court will have significant implications for the candidates and the examination process as a whole.

It will be a test of the NTA's ability to conduct fair and transparent examinations, and the court's intervention will ensure that the candidates get a fair deal.