Monday, 10 August 2026 MUMBAI EDITION LIVE

Dabur Challenges FSSAI Ban On '100%' Claims

Dabur petitions against FSSAI order, ₹150 crore inventory at risk. Delhi High Court stays order.

Mumbai Alert · Sports Desk
Mumbai Alert · Sports Desk
Sports Desk · Mumbai Alert News · Mon, 10 August 2026 at 03:56 pm
Dabur Challenges FSSAI Ban On '100%' Claims

Dabur India has petitioned against the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India's (FSSAI) order restricting the sale of food products carrying '100%' claims, alleging that the regulator's action has put inventory worth around ₹150 crore at risk.

The company argued that the ban was issued without proper reasoning and that claims such as '100% pure' or '100%' do not make any comparison with products of other manufacturers. Dabur stated that such claims are commonly used across the industry and do not undermine competing brands.

The FSSAI had directed companies to stop selling products featuring the '100%' claim with immediate effect, and also asked Dabur to submit an action-taken report within 15 days. Dabur alleged that FSSAI issued the order without providing a show-cause notice, improvement notice, or an opportunity to explain its position.

The company claimed that action was taken in a mechanical manner without properly reviewing product labels. The order affected 11 major products, including Dabur Honey, Dabur Virgin Coconut Oil, and Réal Activ Coconut Water. Dabur also claimed that some products mentioned in the regulator's order did not carry the disputed claim on their labels.

Dabur stated that products such as DABUR HOMMADE Coconut Milk and DABUR Cold Pressed Sesame Oil did not display the '100%' claim, arguing that this reflected a lack of proper assessment before issuing the order. According to FSSAI, Dabur's use of the '100%' claim was misleading and violated the Food Safety and Standards (Advertising and Claims) Regulations, 2018.

Dabur said it had already started changing product labels, advertisements, and online references to remove the disputed claim. The company added that most of the products and promotional material mentioned in the FSSAI communication have either already been updated or are undergoing changes.

The legal dispute comes amid wider regulatory scrutiny of food advertising claims, with FSSAI seeking stricter compliance from manufacturers over product labelling and marketing practices. The Delhi High Court has stayed the FSSAI order against Dabur, providing relief to the company.

The case highlights the importance of regulatory compliance in the food industry, and the need for companies to ensure that their advertising claims are accurate and transparent. The outcome of the case will be closely watched by the industry, as it has implications for how companies market their products and make claims about their quality and purity.

In the meantime, Dabur will continue to update its product labels and advertising to comply with the FSSAI regulations. The company's actions demonstrate its commitment to transparency and compliance, and its willingness to work with regulators to ensure that its products meet the required standards.

The dispute also underscores the need for effective communication and collaboration between regulators and industry players. By working together, companies and regulators can ensure that consumers have access to accurate and reliable information about the products they buy, and that the industry operates in a fair and transparent manner.

In conclusion, the Dabur-FSSAI dispute highlights the complexities and challenges of regulatory compliance in the food industry. As the case continues to unfold, it will be important to monitor developments and assess the implications for companies and consumers alike.

The regulatory environment for food companies in India is becoming increasingly stringent, with a focus on ensuring that products are safe, pure, and accurately labelled. Companies like Dabur must navigate this complex landscape, balancing the need to comply with regulations with the need to market their products effectively and build consumer trust.

Ultimately, the outcome of the Dabur-FSSAI dispute will depend on the court's interpretation of the regulations and the evidence presented by both parties. However, regardless of the outcome, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of regulatory compliance and transparency in the food industry, and the need for companies to prioritize these values in their operations and marketing practices.

Frequently asked questions

What is the issue with Dabur's '100%' claims?

FSSAI alleges that Dabur's use of '100%' claims is misleading and violates regulations.

How much inventory is at risk due to the FSSAI ban?

Dabur claims that inventory worth around ₹150 crore is at risk.

daburfssaifood safetyregulations
X Facebook Telegram
Read the original report ↗

More in Sports

Sports

India Cricket Team Trains In Colombo Ahead Of 1st Test

Team India practices in Colombo, Sarfaraz Khan joins squad

By Mumbai Alert · Sports Desk · 34 min ago

Sports

Watinuksung Jamir Appointed Team India Manager

Nagaland Cricket Association president to manage Indian team in Sri Lanka. First NCA official to hold the position.

By Mumbai Alert · Sports Desk · 55 min ago

Sports

Keely Hodgkinson Seeks Historic European 800m Hat-Trick

Keely Hodgkinson aims for third European gold, faces strong competition, views home win as special

By Mumbai Alert · Sports Desk · 1 hr ago

Sports

India's PUBG Teams Reach Esports World Cup Finals

Two Indian teams qualify, historic moment for Indian esports.

By Mumbai Alert · Sports Desk · 1 hr ago