SC Dismisses Plea Against SRK's Mannat Expansion

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition challenging the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearance granted for the construction of two additional floors at Shah Rukh Khan's residence, Mannat, in Mumbai.

The petition was filed by Santosh Daundkar, who alleged that the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority had erred in allowing CRZ clearance for the renovation of the actor's sea-facing Bandra home.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana questioned the bonafide of the petitioner and refused to interfere with the National Green Tribunal's order dated September 16, 2025. The bench noted that the law had been broadly followed and that it was the actor's choice to construct additional floors on his residential house.

Senior advocate Shoeb Alam, representing the petitioner, argued that the case should not be treated differently simply because it involves a prominent film star. He noted that Daundkar had previously exposed the Adarsh housing scam and is a respected activist.

The National Green Tribunal had earlier dismissed Daundkar's plea, holding that no procedural irregularity or legal infirmity had been shown in the approval granted by the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority.

The Supreme Court's decision comes as a relief to Shah Rukh Khan, who can now proceed with the construction of the additional floors at his residence. The decision also highlights the importance of following the due process of law in such matters.

Mannat, Shah Rukh Khan's residence, is a iconic landmark in Mumbai and has been the subject of much attention and scrutiny over the years. The actor's decision to construct additional floors on his residence had sparked controversy, with some alleging that it violated coastal regulation norms.

The Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearance is a critical aspect of any construction project in coastal areas, and the Supreme Court's decision underscores the need for such clearances to be granted in accordance with the law.

In recent years, there have been several instances of construction projects in coastal areas being challenged on the grounds of violating CRZ norms. The Supreme Court's decision in this case is likely to have implications for such projects in the future.

The decision also highlights the importance of respecting the privacy and property rights of individuals, even in cases where they are public figures. The Supreme Court's remark that it was the actor's choice to construct additional floors on his residential house is significant in this context.

Overall, the Supreme Court's decision is a significant development in the case and is likely to have implications for construction projects in coastal areas in the future.

The verdict is a major relief for Shah Rukh Khan, who can now focus on his upcoming projects without the burden of this legal challenge. The decision also underscores the importance of following the due process of law in such matters and respecting the privacy and property rights of individuals.