Mumbai Seeks Trial In Absentia Of 26/11 Accused

The Mumbai police is seeking to prosecute the wanted accused in the 26/11 terror case, including Hafiz Saeed, in their absence under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023.

The 26/11 terror attack occurred on November 26, 2008, when 10 Pakistani terrorists arrived in Mumbai by sea and opened fire, killing 166 people and injuring several others.

The Indian government has been trying to extradite the wanted accused, but since this has not been successful, the prosecution has decided to continue with the trial in their absence.

The prosecution had already sought a proclamation notice against the wanted accused in June and will now submit a report on the proclamation in the next hearing.

According to Special Public Prosecutor Ujwal Nikam, if the court considers that the wanted accused will not present themselves before the court, it may pass an order to conduct the trial against them in their absence.

In such a case, the court can appoint a lawyer to represent the accused and conduct the trial in their absence.

The lawyer appointed by the court would represent the accused and cross-examine witnesses in their absence.

The prosecution will re-examine relevant witnesses to conduct the trial against the accused.

The BNSS 2023 allows for a court to conduct a criminal trial in the absence of an accused person who has been officially declared a proclaimed offender by the court.

This means that the accused has waived their right to be prosecuted in person.

The prosecution's decision to seek a trial in absentia is a significant development in the 26/11 terror case.

The case has been ongoing for several years, and the prosecution's move is aimed at bringing the accused to justice.

The trial in absentia is expected to proceed under the provisions of the BNSS 2023.

The outcome of the trial is likely to have significant implications for the accused and the victims' families.

The 26/11 terror attack was a devastating incident that shook the city of Mumbai and the country as a whole.

The attack led to a major overhaul of the country's security apparatus and highlighted the need for stronger counter-terrorism measures.

The trial in absentia is a significant step towards bringing the perpetrators of the attack to justice and providing closure to the victims' families.

The case is being closely watched by the people of Mumbai and the country, and the outcome is expected to have a significant impact on the city's security and counter-terrorism efforts.

In conclusion, the prosecution's decision to seek a trial in absentia of the 26/11 accused is a significant development in the case, and the outcome is likely to have major implications for the accused, the victims' families, and the city of Mumbai as a whole.