Bengaluru Resident Faces Rs 1.23L Demand Due to Consultant's Mistake
A Bengaluru resident's tax consultant filed incorrect form, leading to demand. Mistake occurred despite filing under new tax regime.

A Bengaluru resident, Mr Shah, filed his income tax return under the new tax regime, reporting a total income of Rs 32.55 lakh. However, his tax consultant made an error, which led to a demand of Rs 1.23 lakh.
The mistake occurred when the consultant inadvertently filed Form No. 10-IEA on September 30, 2025. This form is not applicable when filing under the new tax regime.
Mr Shah had opted for the new tax regime, which has different tax slabs and rates compared to the old regime. The new regime was introduced to simplify the tax filing process and reduce the tax burden on individuals.
Despite the benefits of the new regime, Mr Shah's tax consultant's mistake led to the incorrect application of tax rates, resulting in the demand of Rs 1.23 lakh. This incident highlights the importance of careful attention to detail when filing tax returns, especially when opting for a new tax regime.
The new tax regime has been available to taxpayers since its introduction, and many have opted for it to reduce their tax liability. However, the transition to the new regime requires careful planning and accurate filing to avoid errors and demands.
In this case, the consultant's mistake has resulted in a significant demand, which could have been avoided with proper attention to detail. The incident serves as a reminder to taxpayers to review their tax returns carefully before filing and to ensure that their consultants are aware of the applicable tax regime and its requirements.
The demand of Rs 1.23 lakh is a significant amount, and Mr Shah may need to take corrective action to resolve the issue. This could involve filing a revised return or seeking assistance from tax authorities to rectify the mistake.
The incident highlights the need for taxpayers to be aware of the tax laws and regulations, especially when opting for a new tax regime. It also emphasizes the importance of careful planning and accurate filing to avoid errors and demands.
In conclusion, the mistake made by Mr Shah's tax consultant has resulted in a significant demand, which could have been avoided with proper attention to detail. The incident serves as a reminder to taxpayers to be cautious when filing their tax returns and to ensure that their consultants are aware of the applicable tax regime and its requirements.
Frequently asked questions
What happened to the Bengaluru resident who filed his ITR under the new tax regime?
He received a demand of Rs 1.23 lakh due to his consultant's mistake of filing an incorrect form.
What form was incorrectly filed by the consultant?
The consultant inadvertently filed Form No. 10-IEA, which is not applicable when filing under the new tax regime.