CJP's Saurav Das Demands BCI Chief's Resignation

The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) co-convenor Saurav Das has called for the resignation of Bar Council of India (BCI) chairman Manan Kumar Mishra. This demand comes after the Supreme Court criticised the BCI for intervening in the NALSAR University of Law enrolment controversy.

Das took to social media to express his views, stating that moral responsibility commands Mishra to resign. He accused the BCI of overstepping its authority in the matter. The CJP co-convenor's statement was in response to the Supreme Court's strong questioning of the BCI's intervention.

The controversy began when the BCI directed state bar councils not to enrol NALSAR's 2026 law graduates as advocates until further orders. This directive followed protests by some students against the proposed participation of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant as chief guest at the university's convocation.

The Supreme Court, headed by CJI Kant, restrained the BCI and state bar councils from taking punitive or criminal action against students or faculty members of national law universities or other universities in connection with the dispute. The court also issued notice to the BCI on a petition challenging the Council's actions and seeking directions against similar orders in the future.

A bench headed by CJI Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, asked the Council to file its response within two weeks. The BCI subsequently withdrew the order following criticism and a proposed protest, and later dropped its proposed factual inquiry into the matter.

The Supreme Court's decision is seen as a significant development in the controversy, with the court asserting its commitment to protecting the rights of students to protest peacefully. The CJP's demand for Mishra's resignation is likely to add to the pressure on the BCI to reconsider its actions.

The Bar Council of India is a statutory body responsible for regulating the legal profession in India. The BCI's actions in the NALSAR controversy have been widely criticised, with many arguing that the Council overstepped its authority.

The Supreme Court's decision to intervene in the matter is a significant development, with the court asserting its commitment to protecting the rights of students to protest peacefully. The controversy has sparked a wider debate about the role of the BCI and the limits of its authority.

In the context of the controversy, the demand for Mishra's resignation is likely to be seen as a call for accountability. The BCI's actions have been widely criticised, and the Supreme Court's decision to intervene has added to the pressure on the Council to reconsider its actions.

The significance of the controversy lies in its implications for the rights of students to protest peacefully. The Supreme Court's decision to intervene in the matter is a significant development, with the court asserting its commitment to protecting these rights. The controversy is also likely to have implications for the role of the BCI and the limits of its authority.

In conclusion, the demand for Mishra's resignation is a significant development in the controversy, with the CJP calling for accountability and the Supreme Court asserting its commitment to protecting the rights of students to protest peacefully. The controversy is likely to have implications for the role of the BCI and the limits of its authority, and is a significant development in the ongoing debate about the regulation of the legal profession in India.