NEET-UG 2026 Result Discrepancy: Student Challenges NTA Before High Court

A case has been filed in the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court alleging a massive 241-mark discrepancy in the NEET-UG 2026 result. The petitioner, Lokendra Singh Khadiya, a student from Jhabua district, claims that the official OMR sheet and answer key indicate he secured 305 marks, whereas the final result awarded him only 64 marks.

The student had appeared for the re-examination conducted on June 21, 2026, after passing Class XII in 2024. When the NTA uploaded the OMR sheet on July 14, 2026, the petitioner alleges that he encountered a technical flaw in the online system. Upon his first login, all responses in the Physics and Chemistry sections appeared blank, but when he logged in again, a different OMR sheet was displayed containing his marked responses.

According to the petition, matching the second OMR sheet with the official answer key shows that the student scored 104 marks in Physics, 125 in Chemistry, and 76 in Biology, taking his total score to 305 marks. Despite this, the final result declared on July 16, 2026, reflected only 64 marks. The petition alleges that the discrepancy points to a serious error in OMR data processing, evaluation, or result preparation.

The student immediately lodged a complaint with the NTA via email after the result was declared, but no effective action was taken. As a result, he is being deprived of the opportunity to participate in the counselling and admission process for various medical courses.

The petition seeks directions to the NTA to independently verify the OMR sheet, evaluation process, and mark calculation, and to correct the result based on the official records. The petitioner has clarified that the case does not seek a re-evaluation of answers but only the rectification of an apparent discrepancy reflected in the NTA's own official records.

The writ petition also challenges the constitution, legal status, and constitutional validity of the National Testing Agency. It contends that the NTA is not a statutory body established by Parliament but merely a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The petition, therefore, seeks judicial scrutiny of the agency's authority and legal competence.

The case highlights the importance of transparency and accuracy in the examination process, particularly in high-stakes exams like NEET-UG. The discrepancy alleged by the student has significant implications for his future, and the court's decision will be closely watched by students, parents, and education stakeholders.

In recent years, there have been several instances of errors and discrepancies in exam results, leading to calls for greater accountability and transparency in the examination process. The NEET-UG exam is a critical gateway for students seeking admission to medical courses, and any errors or discrepancies can have far-reaching consequences.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision in this case will have significant implications for the student, the NTA, and the broader education system. It will be important to monitor the court's proceedings and decision, as it may set a precedent for future cases involving exam discrepancies and challenges to the NTA's authority.

The case also raises questions about the NTA's functioning and its ability to conduct fair and transparent exams. The petitioner's allegations of technical flaws and errors in the online system are serious and warrant a thorough investigation. The court's decision will be closely watched, and it is hoped that it will provide clarity and resolution to the student and other stakeholders involved.

In conclusion, the NEET-UG 2026 result discrepancy case is a significant development that highlights the importance of transparency, accuracy, and accountability in the examination process. The Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision will be closely watched, and it is hoped that it will provide a fair and just resolution to the student and other stakeholders involved.